|

Kashmir Dispute: Legacy of Great Britain: Barrister Sultan Mahmood Chaudhary

Springfield, Virginia. May 9 2015. “The United States Administration should persuade both India and Pakistan to settle the Kashmir conflict through tripartite and purposeful dialogue.” This was stated by the former Prime Minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leader, Barrister Sultan Mehmood Chaudhry, while addressing a public gathering in Washington, D.C. He emphasized that  Kashmir  is the flash point between the two nuclear countries of India and Pakistan which deserves the attention of the world powers.

Barrister Sultan said that the Kashmir dispute is about the right of self-determination of the people of Jammu & Kashmir. The people should be the makers of their destiny and not India or Pakistan. He reiterated that the peace in the region of South Asia, particularly after the withdrawal of NATO forces from Afghanistan would not be possible unless the Kashmir issue is resolved in the light of UN resolutions and in accordance with wishes and will of the people.

Barrister underlined that Kashmir is not a bilateral issue between New Delhi and Islamabad but an internationally recognized dispute, therefore, dialogue process should include all the three parties – India, Pakistan and Kashmiri people.

He informed the audience that the Indian government including its foreign minister Shusma Swaraj tried her best to convince British government to cancel the “Million Man March” in London but the British government gave preference to the freedom of expression and  rejected the Indian demand to cancel the march.

He said that he told the British Parliamentarians during their current election campaign that  Kashmir dispute was a legacy of Great Britain, therefore, it was imperative for British government to resolve the issue once for all.

Barrister Sultan  urged the United States administration to take notice of the human rights violations being perpetrated by the Indian forces on the people of Kashmir.

Barrister said that we want Pakistan to be strong, then alone it could defend the rights of the people of Kashmir.

Prominent Pakistani American scholar and journalist Mr. Mowahid Hussain Shah, Attorney-at-Law and former Special Assistant to Chief Minister of Punjab said that law, facts, and morality are firmly on the side of the people of Kashmir. He added that India may have occupied Kashmir but they have been unable to conquer the spirit of the people. The people of Kashmir have set an heroic example of resistance against all odds.

While highlighting the ongoing violation of international law in Occupied Kashmir and applicable UN resolutions, Mr. Shah urged fair, full, and free plebiscite under UN auspices.  The denial to date to exercise the right of self-determination represents a lethal threat to the just order of the region.

Mr. Shah elaborated that the key issue for the people of Kashmir was never give up the legitimate struggle. They should take the inspirational example of Nelson Mandela, whose steadfastness and unwavering determination compelled the apartheid regime of South Africa to eventually crumble.

Be wary of the nefarious attempts by vested quarters to depict the Kashmiri struggle in terror colors when, in fact, the current Prime Minister of India, Mr. Modi, was himself excluded and barred from entering the United States for 10 years for his direct complicity in the Gujarat massacres of 2002.  The basis of Mr. Modi’s exclusion by the US State Department should have been highlighted and still needs to be highlighted, Mr. Shah elaborated.

Mr. Shah concluded by stressing that Kashmir was a nonpartisan issue, which was beyond party politics in Pakistan.  And shall remain so until justice is done.

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of the World Kashmir Awareness  said that the Kashmir dispute primarily involves the life and future of the eighteen million people of the Jammu & Kashmir so the fairness demands that they need to be included in determining the future status of their State. He added because of the impact of Kashmir conflict on relations between New Delhi and Islamabad , however, it directly affects the peace and stability of the South-Asian subcontinent which includes India, Pakistan and Afghanistan..

Dr. Fai warned that India and Pakistan both being nuclear-weapon states directly confronting each other, this dispute is potentially the most dangerous in the world.  It should, therefore, be a major interest of the U.S. to prevent this dispute from exploding into a conflict which can be catastrophic for a large proportion of the human race. 

Peace between India and Pakistan could help unlock another conflict with even higher stakes for the United States: the war in Afghanistan. Indeed, a growing chorus of experts has begun arguing that the road to Kabul runs through Kashmir—that the U.S. will never stabilize the former without peace in the latter. Suddenly, bringing India and Pakistan together seems to be very much in America’s interest. Which makes the Obama administration’s determination to avoid the issue increasingly hard to fathom, Fai concluded.

Sardar Zarif Khan thanked the participants for their continued support to the cause of Kashmir.

Sardar Zulfiqar Roshan Khan was the “Master of Ceremony’ of the event.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Modi – Sharif Meeting Offers Hope for Peace In South Asia: Dr. Fai

    Washington, D.C. May 28, 2014. “The meeting between Mr. Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India and Mian Nawaz Sharif, the Prime Minister of Pakistan in New Delhi on May 27, 2014 offers hope for peace in South Asia if the course of justice is followed and both leaders undertake to abide by their international commitments.  The people of Kashmir want the people of India and Pakistan to live in peace and prosperity.  That is why they believe that Kashmir conflict has to be resolved not through military means but through peaceful tripartite negotiations between Governments of India and Pakistan & the people of Kashmir, stated Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General, World Kashmir Awareness at Baltimore Convention Center.
  • |

    How I became Involved in the Cause of Kashmir at the international level

    I want to tell you a little story that touched my life in a very personal way in 1979. It is important to consider, I assure you, because of its historic significance, not only in having an impact in a very real way upon my own survival and the personal vision I came to adopt for the rest of my life, but how it came to shape the very destiny of Kashmir itself. My own life became inextricably linked just as intimately as a man and woman united in marriage. Each detail of this story is integral to understanding who I was then, who I am now, and the process that formed my calling and the rest of my life.
     
    I was in my late 20s then with a driving zeal, as is in every young man’s heart in Kashmir, to make a significant impact somewhere and somehow on life’s stage. At this particular time, I had been placed in charge of the international section of a major conference being held in the Capitol of Kashmir, Srinagar. I was inspired to invite a speaker of an international stature whose presence could be used to energize and internationalize the issue of Kashmir on the right of self-determination.
  • |

    Human Rights: Are They Universal?

    Only on paper has humanity yet achieved glory, beauty, truth, knowledge, virtue, and abiding love.” George Bernard Shaw

    It is tragic that civilized nations have fallen from their lofty calling: namely, human rights for all mankind. There is a sad commentary on the state of human rights all over the globe. It seems to me that until there evolves a generally accepted moral duty among peoples and nations to assist all victims of widespread human rights violations by force or other stiff retaliation, human rights enforcement mechanisms will operate haphazardly and whimsically for reasons unrelated to the harm to the victims or the villainy of the perpetrators. It is the job of all human rights defenders to jump-start that moral evolution.

  • |

    Universal Development Agenda & Our Priorities

    The issue of ‘universal development agenda’ is the issue of the twenty-first century. Never before have so many suffered amidst liberty and luxury for the few. The wealth of single individuals exceeds the wealth of many nations. In highly developed countries, the number of persons living past 80 years is soaring. In deprived and convulsed countries, the average longevity is but half that age. While citizens of some African and Asian countries are starving, the rich countries are beset with obesity. Discrepancies of these types are morally disturbing. The United Nations is ideally suited to ending these shocking inequalities because it hosts all the nations of the world and endows each with identical voting power in the General Assembly. The poorest and the weakest are equal to the richest and the strongest.

  • |

    YOUTH HEROES IN KASHMIR FLOOD

     

    This flood was the first in history, in the living memory of Kashmir.  More than 450 people are dead, and more than $1bn in destruction has been estimated.  The actual magnitude of the total destruction, the number of dead and the people who are missing may not be known for some time. Kashmir Valley was cut off from the rest of the world for days.  Thousands of villages have been submerged, including the capitol city of Srinagar. Hundreds of thousands of people particularly in the rural areas still remain trapped without any outside help or rescue and relief. There has been a total breakdown in communication with no telephone contact of the people with their loved ones  Boats were not available.  People had to stand on their rooftops waiting for someone to rescue them.

  • |

    Is Kashmir an Issue of Election of Self-determination?

    This is an opportunity to explore a vexing but significant topic in the field of human rights: self-determination. The right of self-determination has been celebrated for ages. It is a basic principle of the United Nation Charter which has been reaffirmed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and applied countless times to the settlement of international disputes. The concept played a significant part in the post-world war I settlement, leading for example to plebiscite in a number of disputed border areas, even though no reference was made to self-determination in the League of Nations Covenant.