“We need pens and computers, and not guns and grenades” Lord Nazir Ahmed

Views

Chicago, September 8, 2015. “Tripartite negotiations between Governments of India, Pakistan and Kashmiri leadership is the only way to resolve the outstanding dispute of Jammu & Kashmir,” said Lord Nazir Ahmed, Member, British House of Lords during the 52nd Annual Convention of Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) on the subject of, ‘Kashmir: A Case of Steadfastness.’

Lord Nazir said that prime minister Modi’s reckless defiance to resolve the Kashmir dispute is a threat to the regional peace and stability. And the international community should be deeply concerned regarding Indian Chief of Army, Dalbir Singh’s threats of ‘a limited War’ with Pakistan . Two nuclear countries could spark off a regional war that will effect the entire world. He warned that BJP supported by Shiv Sinna and RSS are implementing their desire of ‘Hindutva’ and the international community should take notice of that.

Lord Nazir elaborated the continued massive human rights atrocities and the brutalities committed by Indian army in Occupied Kashmir for the last 25 years. The shelling of Indian army on the Working Boundary in Pakistan and Line of Control (LoC) has caused many civilian casualties which is a breach of international law. He appealed the United States administration to help end these atrocities in Kashmir; and persuade both India and Pakistan to explore a mechanism so that the people of Jammu & Kashmir can exercise their right of self-determination. “I want to see free distribution of pens and computers, and not guns and grenades,” Lord added.

Lord Nazir said that India and Pakistan cannot talk about Kashmir and at the same time exclude the Kashmiri leadership from these talks. The people of Kashmir are the important party to the dispute. He said that Kashmiri diaspora will play an important role to pave the way for creating a conducive atmosphere for the dialogue that can lead us to a durable and lasting settlement of the Kashmir dispute. Lord Nazir called upon Government of India to issue the passports to the leaders of All Parties Hurriyat conference to enable them to attend the forthcoming ‘Million-Man- March’ on October 25, 2015 in New York City.

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General, World Kashmir Awareness said because both India and Pakistan, being nuclear weapon states directly confronting each other, this dispute is potentially the most dangerous in the world. It should, therefore, be a major interest of the U.S. to prevent this dispute from exploding into a conflict which can be catastrophic for a large proportion of the human race.

Fai dismissed the mantra repeated by Shushma Swaraj, the foreign minister of India that Kashmir was an integral part of India. Fai explained that Kashmir is recognized – under international law and by the United States – as a disputed territory. He quoted President Obama who said on November 8, 2010, that Kashmir was the long-standing dispute.

Fai explained that India repeats too often to resolve the Kashmir dispute through bilateral talks with Pakistan. The experience of sixty-nine years testifies that bilateral talks between India and Pakistan have yielded no agreements. The missing element is the inclusion of the Kashmiri leadership in the talks with the support of the United States.

Fai said that some discerning observers perceive a growing awareness in the Indian middle class that the persistence of the Kashmir problem weakens India by diminishing its stature among the great powers.

From Jai Prakash Narain, “We profess democracy but rule by force in Kashmir,” to Vir Sanghvi ” Let the Kashmiris determine their own destiny,” to Swaminathan Aiyar “Let Kashmiris decide the outcome, not the politicians and armies of India and Pakistan,” to Arundhati Roy “Kashmir has never been an integral part of India,” to Justice V. M. Tarkunde, “A grant of plebiscite to the people of the Kashmir Valley is the obvious solution,” to Ashok Mitra, “The issue in Kashmir is neither communal nor religious,” to Ved Bhasin, “Independent Kashmir would become a bridge between India and Pakistan,” are few examples to ponder upon. But this constructive trend will vanish if the U.S. is seen as tolerant of India’s obduracy and unmindful of healthier opinion in India itself about what is best for India.

Professor (Dr.) Imtiyaz Kahn, Vice President, Kashmiri American Council (KAC) and Emcee of the event said that the Kashmir question was one of the oldest unresolved international conflicts in the world. He said that the people of Kashmir demand releasing of political prisoners in Indian occupied Kashmir. They also demand that Government of India must annul various special repressive laws; and restore the rights of peaceful association, assembly and demonstrations. They urge the world powers to persuade both India and Pakistan to demilitarize Jammu & Kashmir from both sides of the Ceasefire Line, Dr. Khan concluded.

Similar Posts

  • The Kashmir Dispute: Taking Lessons from Aaland Islands

    There are some disputes in modern history that one might take lessons from in understanding the wisest course to take in resolving the Kashmiri dispute.

    The Aaland Islands is a case in point. The Aaland Islands are joined at the hip — well, should I say, the toe of Finland — and has been considered of strategic importance from the standpoint of defense for Sweden, because of its role as a kind of sentinel to the entrances to the port of Stockholm, as well as the approaches to the Gulf of Bothnia, in addition to being situated near the Gulf of Finland.

  • Kashmiris can determine their own political destiny: Dr. Fai

    Baltimore, Maryland. May 31, 2016. “The world powers have voiced not a syllable of reproach to India for its human rights violations in Kashmir. Their tacit message to India’s leaders: your economic attractiveness and hegemony in South Asia exculpate your human rights atrocities in Kashmir. Does that reflect a profile in courage?” this was stated by Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of World Kashmir Awareness during the 41st Annual Convention of Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA).

    Dr. Fai was speaking in the panel, entitled, “Muslims Around The World Series” on the subject of Kashmir. Other speakers included Dr. Nikibur Rahman, son of Motiur Rahman Nizami who was executed in Bangladesh on May 11, 2016 through a trial procedure that international human rights groups, including ‘Amnesty International’ have condemned as deeply flawed. ‘The Arab Spring: 6 Years later’ was presented by Dr. Abdul Mawgoud Dardery, former Member of Parliament of Egypt.

  • International Educational Development :: Kashmir Peace Conference

    International Educational Development

    (an NGO accredited with the United Nations)

    Invites you to

    Kashmir Peace Conference

    Beyond the Blame Game: Finding Common Ground for Peace & Justice in Kashmir

    Date: Monday, December 7, 2015

    Venue:  Church Center, 777  First Avenue at 44th Street. New York, NY 10017.

    Time: Registration begins at 9.30 a.m.

  • Kashmir is not forgotten. We are not going to let it happen: Dr. Korhola

    Washington, D.C. February 6, 2106. “It is in the interest of world peace that India and Pakistan need to resolve the Kashmir dispute to the satisfaction of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The final and durable settlement of the Kashmir dispute will undoubtedly guarantee peace and stability in the region of South Asia. It will also have a great impact on the international peace and security,” this was stated by Dr. Eija-Riitta Korhola who served as the member of the Foreign Relations Committee of the European Parliament and who was the key-note speaker at the Kashmir Solidarity Day event organized here by friends of Kashmir in Washington, DC metropolitan area and beyond. The event was attended by a large number of people interested in peace and stability in the region of South Asia.

    Dr. Korhola added, “Kashmir is not forgotten. We are not going to let it happen. Why? Because as human beings we cannot afford ignoring basic right of self-determination. She emphasized, “The Kashmir problem was in many ways created by one of our members in the EU. When the British left India in 1947, they left without defining the future of Kashmir. Because of this historical background Europe has a special responsibility to make sure that the Kashmiri people will get the right to have the promised referendum to define their own future.”

  • Kashmir: The Pursuit of the Possible

    Benjamin Franklin, a signer of the U.S. Declaration of Independence from Britain, and a man responsible for negotiating a treaty between the colonies and France, asked, “When will mankind be convinced and agree to settle their difficulties by arbitration?”

    Perhaps the simple answer to that is that it will occur when power is distributed among men in such a way that it cannot be abused by any individual or nation, and that both personal and national sovereignty is once and for all respected.

    Benjamin Franklin was a very wise man. He wrote, in respect to the American Revolution, “We have been assured, sir, in the sacred writings, that ‘except the Lord build the house they labor in vain that build it.’ I firmly believe this; and I also believe that without His concurring aid we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel; we shall be divided by our little partial, local interests, our projects will be confounded and we ourselves shall become a reproach and a byword down to future ages. And, what is worse, mankind may hereafter, from this unfortunate instance, despair of establishing government by human wisdom and leave it to chance, war, or conquest.”

  • Resolution of Kashmir can Unlock War in Afghanistan

    The idea that the dispute over the status of Jammu and Kashmir can be settled only in accordance with the will of the people, which can be ascertained through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, was the common ground taken by all the three parties to the dispute, viz., the people of Kashmir, Pakistan, and India. It was supported without any dissent by the United Nations Security Council and prominently championed by the United States, Great Britain, France and other democratic states.

    It became a matter of controversy only after India realized that she could not win the people’s vote. Due to the cold war, she found a firm ally for her obstructionist position in the Soviet Union. With the end of the cold war, the original perspective should have been recovered.