|

Be Back Soon

Be Back Soon

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai

Washington, D.C.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Saying goodbye is sometimes easy but sometimes a very difficult thing to do, particularly when I am saying goodbye, though temporarily, to freedom and to a mission that I have given my life to. But the real goodbye is not the words that I have formed in my head because there are none that express how I really feel. The goodbye is in a slowly swelling sense of absence of all the people and places and efforts I have put my heart into that has become like a flower near a pond that may dry up for lack of rain. Its sustenance is going away. The absence is the letting go of all the things that I embrace. How does one let go of love? How does one let go of one’s heart, one’s very life? A life is not merely held within one’s blood circulating in the body or in the breath that one takes. It is so much more in all the people that I have lived for and my beloved country of origin, Kashmir – the paradise on earth.

However difficult it is, I thought that now would be the right time to say good-bye to all those thousands of well wishers who have kept me in their prayers during these tough times. I am extremely grateful for the warm and generous support that I have received from all of you. Being separated from my family and friends especially will not be easy during these two years that I will be incarcerated, starting today, July 10, 2012. It is even more difficult to imagine what lies ahead in this period of having to live in circumstances that are so unknown and so obviously designed to be punitive rather than supportive and psychologically sustaining. Nevertheless, I know that I will be comforted in some ways.

I have discovered through this difficult episode in my life the true depth of my friendships with so many good people irrespective of their religious affiliations and cultural background, who have stood with me, and it is that spirit of love and brotherhood that has brought me to a moment in my life that is unique and paradoxically even hopeful. I can already see that this could be a transforming journey of renewal and self-discovery and perhaps even a spiritual awakening. I do not know what events will unfold in Jammu & Kashmir during my physical absence from you. But I do know for certain one thing: the sanctity of the cause of Kashmir will not diminish.

There are many reasons for keeping the hope alive. The struggle for self-determination has lasted for more than eight decades, beginning in 1931, even before the era of Mahatma Gandhi and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The will of the people to sustain their struggle for self determination has been impeded at times but in the end has survived even the most horrendous conditions of occupation that have been inflicted upon our people. It’s clear that this will not die.

Although the world powers have not been forthright in helping the people of Jammu & Kashmir realize their right to self-determination. It seems that trade matters more than human lives. The vast commercial market in India represents a serious distraction and seems invariably to take priority over any application of human rights policy. But the world powers are still committed at least in principle that any settlement of Kashmir must take into account the wishes and aspirations of the people. There is an urgent need to act on this. Nevertheless, the stated policy of world powers including the United States is consistent and does offer hope, at least, that the sacrifices of the people of Kashmir have not gone in vain.

The world powers have also made it clear that Indian policy on Kashmir is both mistaken and misleading in expressing the view that Kashmir is “an integral part of India.” On January 4, 2012 when the United States, State Department spokesperson Ms. Victoria Nuland was asked by an Indian journalist what the dotted lines in the map between India and Pakistan meant, she replied, It reflects Kashmir’s unresolved status and it also reflects that this is in dispute. Another Indian journalist asked: if you say that Kashmir is in dispute, that is not going to please the Indians at all. Well, again, it is consistent with longstanding U.S. policy, she replied. This declaration establishes a line in the sand, as it were, that challenges India to pay attention to a long history of United Nations resolutions and established principles regarding the disposition of Kashmir. The groundwork well established for self-determination cannot easily be undone.

When 120 world leaders met in Durbin, South Africa, during the 12th Summit of the Nonaligned Movement, (NAM), the Chairman of the Summit, President Nelson Mandela said in his opening remarks, “All of us remain concerned that the issue of Jammu and Kashmir should be solved through peaceful negotiations and should be willing to lend all the strength we have to the resolution of this matter.”

Even the closest ally of India, Russia, which has on occasion blocked the progress of Kashmir at the Security Council, is on record in support of ending the conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin who has made numerous attempts to broker a settlement between India and Pakistan, has said, “India and Pakistan should resolve the Kashmir dispute in the interest of peace in South Asia and the rest of the world.” These are all good signs that further progress can be made under the right conditions.

In addition, it should be made clear that Kashmiri American Council (KAC) is not dead. There are people who wish that the KAC was no longer active and that the Kashmiri American community cannot play any role in the future. This is delusional. Yes, as I said in the court and it needs to be repeated that words possibly cannot define the damage that I have caused to my family, friends and the United States of America and for which I am paying a great price. But, at the same time, the very judge who sentenced me, Judge O’Grady, whose opinion was based upon all the facts made it very clear that the cause of Kashmir was a wonderful cause and should by all means be furthered. Judge said, “I know that the KAC is dormant, I guess is the word for it at this stage, but there may be an opportunity to arrange conferences through other people in the future, and I hope that cause continues to be identified as an important international matter.” The judge’s opinion challenged every Kashmiri American and the friends of Kashmir to continue advocating for the cause. Yes, I will be away for some time, but there are many others who can continue publicizing the just cause of Kashmir. KAC is alive and well and will continue its work completely unimpeded.

With that, my very best wishes, I thank you again for your long support, and until we meet next time united in our hopes and aspirations. Till then, ‘Khuda Hafiz’, may God bless you and your families! Ameen.

Similar Posts

  • |

    President Obama Can Help Bring Peace in South Asia

    “We should probably try to facilitate a better understanding between Pakistan and India and try to resolve the Kashmir crisis…” President Obama, October 30, 2008
     
    Your planned visit to India has inspired hopes, in the hearts of Americans of Kashmiri origin, that your global statesmanship may move the frozen dispute over the status of Kashmir towards a settlement based on justice and rationality. We would hasten to add that while we are fully aware of the multiplicity of issues that you will be devoting your time and attention during your forthcoming visit to India, you may perhaps like to remember that Kashmir is not a new issue, having been on the agenda of and in the cognizance of the United Nations for nearly 68 years.  Ironically, it is the only entity in the region of South Asia which has so far been denied the opportunity to determine its political future.
  • |

    Kashmir Dispute: Legacy of Great Britain: Barrister Sultan Mahmood Chaudhary

    Springfield, Virginia. May 9 2015. “The United States Administration should persuade both India and Pakistan to settle the Kashmir conflict through tripartite and purposeful dialogue.” This was stated by the former Prime Minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leader, Barrister Sultan Mehmood Chaudhry, while addressing a public gathering in Washington, D.C. He emphasized that  Kashmir  is the flash point between the two nuclear countries of India and Pakistan which deserves the attention of the world powers.

  • |

    Kashmir: Trouble in Paradise

    So much for Ban Ki-moon’s heart and possibly even more so his soul. One can only recall the quote in Matthew and the betrayal of Jesus, “When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this Man’s blood; see to that yourselves.”

    The United Nations has walked away from the slaughter in Kashmir and washed its hands of it, and the world body has told India, “it’s your problem. See to that yourselves.” Even the U.S. State Department spokesman John Kirby has deferred all inquiries about the “killing fields” of Kashmir to the Indian government, the very source of all the bloodshed. That’s like referring the problem of foxes in the henhouse to Chief Minister Fox.

  • |

    Bad for Business: India’s White Elephant Kashmir – Part 2

    Ultimately the referendum in Scotland was held in a peaceful manner, and the people decided according to their own free will not to be an independent nation. This was undoubtedly a victory for democratic principles and universal values. The people of Kashmir do not want anything more than that. They want the same principle to be equally applicable to Kashmir. Let the people decide.
  • |

    Kashmir Needs Political And Not Military Solution: Dr. Fai

    Baltimore, Maryland. April 17, 2017. Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of ‘World Kashmir Awareness Forum’ voiced his continuing belief that the conflict over Kashmir cannot be resolved through military means. Kashmir is a political issue and has to be resolved through political means by involving all parties to the conflict – the Governments of India & Pakistan and the legitimate leadership of the Kashmiri resistance. He was speaking on the subject of Kashmir at the 42nd Annual Convention of ‘Islamic Circle of North America’ at Baltimore Convention Center. More than 20,000 people participated in this year’s convention. Other panelists included: Mr. Adem Carroll, Dr. M. A. Dhar, Dr. Nakibur Rahman and Bro. Tariq Rehman.

  • Kashmiri aspirations must be respected

    “If parties (India & Pakistan) come here and both of them call upon the Security Council to make recommendations for the solution of their (Kashmir) dispute, ought they not in advance agree to abide by it? They are not bound to ask the Security Council to make such recommendations, but if they do, I ask the Committee of Experts if they have not thereby implied that they will conform or try to conform to them.” Ambassador Warren Austin of the United States at the Security Council on May 26, 1948.

    If promises are made to be broken, then Kashmir may be summoned to prove the treacherous proposition. Broken promises haunt Kashmir’s history, and explain its tragedy.

    The Kashmir issue is simply this: the people of a large territory which is not part of any existing sovereign state were assured by the entire international community represented by the United Nations that they would be enabled to decide their future by a free vote. Until now, this assurance has not been honored.

    With the lapse of British paramountcy on August 15, 1947, broken promises over Kashmir came not like single spies but in battalions, to borrow from Hamlet. Princely states enjoyed three options: accession to India, accession to Pakistan, or independence. But the choice, according to India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and tacitly endorsed by the British,