|

Be Back Soon

Articles, Uncategorised

Be Back Soon

Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai

Washington, D.C.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Saying goodbye is sometimes easy but sometimes a very difficult thing to do, particularly when I am saying goodbye, though temporarily, to freedom and to a mission that I have given my life to. But the real goodbye is not the words that I have formed in my head because there are none that express how I really feel. The goodbye is in a slowly swelling sense of absence of all the people and places and efforts I have put my heart into that has become like a flower near a pond that may dry up for lack of rain. Its sustenance is going away. The absence is the letting go of all the things that I embrace. How does one let go of love? How does one let go of one’s heart, one’s very life? A life is not merely held within one’s blood circulating in the body or in the breath that one takes. It is so much more in all the people that I have lived for and my beloved country of origin, Kashmir – the paradise on earth.

However difficult it is, I thought that now would be the right time to say good-bye to all those thousands of well wishers who have kept me in their prayers during these tough times. I am extremely grateful for the warm and generous support that I have received from all of you. Being separated from my family and friends especially will not be easy during these two years that I will be incarcerated, starting today, July 10, 2012. It is even more difficult to imagine what lies ahead in this period of having to live in circumstances that are so unknown and so obviously designed to be punitive rather than supportive and psychologically sustaining. Nevertheless, I know that I will be comforted in some ways.

I have discovered through this difficult episode in my life the true depth of my friendships with so many good people irrespective of their religious affiliations and cultural background, who have stood with me, and it is that spirit of love and brotherhood that has brought me to a moment in my life that is unique and paradoxically even hopeful. I can already see that this could be a transforming journey of renewal and self-discovery and perhaps even a spiritual awakening. I do not know what events will unfold in Jammu & Kashmir during my physical absence from you. But I do know for certain one thing: the sanctity of the cause of Kashmir will not diminish.

There are many reasons for keeping the hope alive. The struggle for self-determination has lasted for more than eight decades, beginning in 1931, even before the era of Mahatma Gandhi and Mohammad Ali Jinnah. The will of the people to sustain their struggle for self determination has been impeded at times but in the end has survived even the most horrendous conditions of occupation that have been inflicted upon our people. It’s clear that this will not die.

Although the world powers have not been forthright in helping the people of Jammu & Kashmir realize their right to self-determination. It seems that trade matters more than human lives. The vast commercial market in India represents a serious distraction and seems invariably to take priority over any application of human rights policy. But the world powers are still committed at least in principle that any settlement of Kashmir must take into account the wishes and aspirations of the people. There is an urgent need to act on this. Nevertheless, the stated policy of world powers including the United States is consistent and does offer hope, at least, that the sacrifices of the people of Kashmir have not gone in vain.

The world powers have also made it clear that Indian policy on Kashmir is both mistaken and misleading in expressing the view that Kashmir is “an integral part of India.” On January 4, 2012 when the United States, State Department spokesperson Ms. Victoria Nuland was asked by an Indian journalist what the dotted lines in the map between India and Pakistan meant, she replied, It reflects Kashmir’s unresolved status and it also reflects that this is in dispute. Another Indian journalist asked: if you say that Kashmir is in dispute, that is not going to please the Indians at all. Well, again, it is consistent with longstanding U.S. policy, she replied. This declaration establishes a line in the sand, as it were, that challenges India to pay attention to a long history of United Nations resolutions and established principles regarding the disposition of Kashmir. The groundwork well established for self-determination cannot easily be undone.

When 120 world leaders met in Durbin, South Africa, during the 12th Summit of the Nonaligned Movement, (NAM), the Chairman of the Summit, President Nelson Mandela said in his opening remarks, “All of us remain concerned that the issue of Jammu and Kashmir should be solved through peaceful negotiations and should be willing to lend all the strength we have to the resolution of this matter.”

Even the closest ally of India, Russia, which has on occasion blocked the progress of Kashmir at the Security Council, is on record in support of ending the conflict. Russian President Vladimir Putin who has made numerous attempts to broker a settlement between India and Pakistan, has said, “India and Pakistan should resolve the Kashmir dispute in the interest of peace in South Asia and the rest of the world.” These are all good signs that further progress can be made under the right conditions.

In addition, it should be made clear that Kashmiri American Council (KAC) is not dead. There are people who wish that the KAC was no longer active and that the Kashmiri American community cannot play any role in the future. This is delusional. Yes, as I said in the court and it needs to be repeated that words possibly cannot define the damage that I have caused to my family, friends and the United States of America and for which I am paying a great price. But, at the same time, the very judge who sentenced me, Judge O’Grady, whose opinion was based upon all the facts made it very clear that the cause of Kashmir was a wonderful cause and should by all means be furthered. Judge said, “I know that the KAC is dormant, I guess is the word for it at this stage, but there may be an opportunity to arrange conferences through other people in the future, and I hope that cause continues to be identified as an important international matter.” The judge’s opinion challenged every Kashmiri American and the friends of Kashmir to continue advocating for the cause. Yes, I will be away for some time, but there are many others who can continue publicizing the just cause of Kashmir. KAC is alive and well and will continue its work completely unimpeded.

With that, my very best wishes, I thank you again for your long support, and until we meet next time united in our hopes and aspirations. Till then, ‘Khuda Hafiz’, may God bless you and your families! Ameen.

Similar Posts

  • Kashmiri aspirations must be respected

    “If parties (India & Pakistan) come here and both of them call upon the Security Council to make recommendations for the solution of their (Kashmir) dispute, ought they not in advance agree to abide by it? They are not bound to ask the Security Council to make such recommendations, but if they do, I ask the Committee of Experts if they have not thereby implied that they will conform or try to conform to them.” Ambassador Warren Austin of the United States at the Security Council on May 26, 1948.

    If promises are made to be broken, then Kashmir may be summoned to prove the treacherous proposition. Broken promises haunt Kashmir’s history, and explain its tragedy.

    The Kashmir issue is simply this: the people of a large territory which is not part of any existing sovereign state were assured by the entire international community represented by the United Nations that they would be enabled to decide their future by a free vote. Until now, this assurance has not been honored.

    With the lapse of British paramountcy on August 15, 1947, broken promises over Kashmir came not like single spies but in battalions, to borrow from Hamlet. Princely states enjoyed three options: accession to India, accession to Pakistan, or independence. But the choice, according to India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and tacitly endorsed by the British,

  • |

    Dr. Fai Welcomed Talks Between India and Pakistan

    Washington, D.C. July 6, 2012. Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai has welcomed the foreign secretaries’ talks between New Delhi & Islamabad on July 4 – 5, 2012 where they exchanged views on the issue of Jammu & Kashmir and agreed ‘to continue discussions in a purposeful and forward looking manner with the view to finding a peaceful solution by narrowing divergences and building convergences.’ “These talks offer hope for peace in South Asia if the course of justice is followed and both parties undertake to abide by their commitments. The continuance of talks can only be useful if they reflect a sense of urgency and prepare the ground for an earnest effort at the highest level to frame a step-by-step plan of settlement of the Kashmir dispute. Mere persistence of talks at a level lower than political leadership of the two countries – and that too at a leisurely pace – will in no way defuse the situation. Unintentionally though, it will mock the agony of the people of Kashmir rather than assuage it,” Fai added.

  • |

    Why does India have a hard time to accept the disputed nature of Kashmir?

    “Kashmir is an integral part of India, constitutionally, legally and morally something that is non-negotiable.” Ram Jethmalani, Outlook Magazine, October 8, 2016.

    “Let me state unequivocally that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and will always remain so.’ Sushma Swaraj September 26, 2016

    The fallacy advocated by the most celebrated Indian jurist and the Indian foreign minister deserves some clarification.

    The people of Jammu & Kashmir who number more than 129 other existing independent nations individually and have a defined historical identity, are at present engaged in a mass struggle to win freedom and release from the foreign occupation of their land. This struggle is motivated by no bigotry or ethnic prejudice; its aim is nothing but the exercise of the right of self-determination explicitly agreed by both India and Pakistan.

    To the horrors of the repression from which they suffer are added two other circumstances, each cruelly adverse. One is the apathy of the world outside, including the United States that otherwise are justly proud of their championship of democracy and human rights. The second is the fog of myths and evasive arguments, like Kashmir being an integral part of India. It is my modest attempt to help mitigate these two circumstances. My appeal is directed neither to the religious or ideological sympathies of Indian Public Square nor to their leanings towards any particular political party but solely to their conscience and human concern.

  • |

    State of human rights in Kashmir : Testimony

    March 17, 2014

    Sir Nigel Rodley
    Chairperson
    UN Human Rights Committee
    Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
    Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
    E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:

    I am grateful for the opportunity to submit this testimony on the state of human rights in Kashmir to the 110th session of the United Nations Human Rights Committee being held in Geneva, Switzerland, this week until March 28, 2014. Much to my chagrin in light of the warming of diplomacy between India and Pakistan and incipient dialogue between India and Kashmiri leaders, the state of human rights in the disputed territory is chilling. Indeed, it shocks the conscience.

    Indiscriminate killings:

    The best estimate of extrajudicial killings in Kashmir since 1989 approaches a staggering 100,000. That number dwarfs the killings in Northern Ireland, Palestine, Bosnia, Kosovo and Southern Sudan which have brought the world to tears and revulsion. The 100,000 corpses also tops the death toll for United States forces in Vietnam over 10 years.

    Arundhati Roy, an Indian novelist, essayist, the Booker Prize and Sydney Peace Prize winner said that “Caught in the middle are the people of Kashmir. More than 100,000 people, mostly innocent civilians, have died in the 20-year conflict.”

  • |

    Kashmir’s Jalil Andrabi and China’s Chen Guangcheng: A Similar Path, but a Fork in the Road

    One of the darkest chapters of Indian judicial partiality was left hanging half closed and banging in the wind when Major Avtar Singh, the killer of internationally known human rights activist and Chairman of Kashmir Commission of Jurists, Advocate Jalil Andrabi, was found dead after he killed his wife and two children, and finally himself this past Saturday morning, June 9, 2012, in Selma, California. Avtar Singh, a fugitive from justice, who lived in the hot dry central California community, a suburb of Fresno, was clearly haunted by his past, a past that had seen the blood spilled of more than one man by his own hands. He had killed four others to hide the murder of Andrabi, and now he had killed his own family.  

    In killing Jalil Andrabi, Avtar Singh certainly did not act on his own volition. He was only a major.   His act was no doubt a response to orders from above and occurred in a longstanding climate of impunity that the Indian army enjoys in Kashmir.   The Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives any Indian soldier the right in Kashmir to take a Kashmiri’s life under any circumstance, has enabled such a climate for decades.  And Jalil Andrabi had become a hated, despised man by the Army, a man dangerous to the status quo of continued murder and torture that had been taking place in Kashmir’s jails, interrogation centers and detention facilities for many years.