|

Kashmiri American community vowed to continue the struggle for self-determination

 

bombay1

Washington, D.C. June 5, 2012. The Kashmiri-American community in the Washington metropolitan area has vowed to continue their struggle for right to self-determination. At an impressive gathering at Bombay Tandoor, Tysons Corner, members of the community including academics, political activists and friends of Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai, pledged to carry forward his work during the period of his incarceration.

Speaking on the occasion, Dr Fai said there is no restriction on him to continue his work for a universally acknowledged cause. He clarified to his well-wishers that the prosecution had withdrawn charges initially leveled against him to be the agent of a foreign government.

Judge Liam O’Grady, while announcing the verdict for two-year imprisonment earlier this year, had made it clear that “it’s (sentencing) necessary, even though you have done some very moving things on behalf of the Kashmir people and that your cause is a wonderful cause,” Fai told the gathering.

Dr. Fai urged the community members to continue to support the cause of Kashmir. He quoted again Judge O’Grady who said, “I sincerely hope that while you’re at a minimal security facility like Cumberland, that I see no reason why you can’t continue to advocate on behalf of the Kashmiri people and to write. I know that the KAC is dormant, I guess is the word for it at this stage, but there may be an opportunity to arrange conferences through other people in the future, and I hope that cause continues to be identified as an important international matter. And good luck to you.”

“No solution to the 65‑year‑old Kashmir conflict that does not command a consensus among the 17 million Kashmiri people can endure, Dr. Fai stressed, just as no solution to East Timor held a chance of success until the East Timorese leadership was consulted and a referendum on independence from Indonesia was held.”

For too long, Fai underscored, India’s persecution of people of Kashmir has been buried by the fetching slogan, “The world’s largest democracy.” There is no democracy in Kashmir; only military rule and the law of the gun. In fact the presence of more than 700,000 Indian military and paramilitary forces have made Kashmir the largest army concentration anywhere in the world.

Mr. Hamid Malik, President, Pakistan Link while welcoming the participants said. “The Kashmiri American community is honored to have the people like Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai who has dedicated his life for the cause of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. We remain indebted to him for his friendship and leadership during the past two decades.

Dr. Imtiaz Khan noted that more than 100,000 Kashmiris have been killed by Indian military and paramilitary personnel over the last two decades, and deplored the silence of the international community because of India’s nuclear and economic strength. 

Dr. Khan maintained that United Nations Security Council resolutions shouldered the United Nations with a moral obligation to intervene on behalf of the people of Kashmir; and, that the United Nations should thicken its monitoring force along the cease‑fire line.

Dr. Zulfiqar Kazmi said that Kashmiris crave only what every American covets: human rights, democratic values, peace and justice, and believe that the United States successes in East Timor and Southern Sudan could be duplicated in Kashmir with persistence, moral suasion, and statesmanship.

Dr. Kazmi maintained that bilateral India‑Pakistan talks could never resolve the Kashmir conflict. That formula has proven utterly bankrupt for more than 65 years, and nothing has changed but the faces.

Sardar Zahoor  Khan asked, is trade and commerce trampling on principles, democratic values, and human rights in Kashmir?  He said that the sacrifices given by the people of Kashmir must no go in vain.

Sardar Zalfiqar Khan said that the way to resolve the Kashmir dispute is through peaceful tripartite negotiations. Even this will not succeed unless there is the direct involvement of a third party, like the United States or the United Nations.

bombay13Mr. Mazhar Chugtai said that the US must assume the position as a leader and take an active role in finding a lasting settlement on Kashmir. It is obvious that no settlement can last if it is not based on justice for the people of Kashmir and recognition of their inherent rights.

Mr. Zubair Khan said that the Governments of India and Pakistan should include the Kashmiri leadership ‑ the All Parties Hurriyet Conference that represents the broader spectrum of the opinion of the people of Kashmir –with the peace process.

Mr. Zahid Hussain said that Kashmir needs international attention.  It is the most dangerous nuclear hotspot on the earth. Third party mediation is imperative after more than half a century of bankrupt bilateral bickering between India and Pakistan.

Mr. Sheikh Siddik suggested that Kashmiris themselves must be made an equal negotiating partner in the peace enterprise.  Their studied exclusion from  any role in deciding their own fate in the past has proved disastrous both for themselves and South Asia generally.

Mr. Junaid Bashir emphasized that human rights are cheapened, when enforcement is selective. He ended optimistically by declaring that he was certain that a self-determination solution to Kashmir can be fashioned that honors the aspirations and wishes of the people of Jammu & Kashmir.

Dr. Maqsood Chaudhary appealed to the international community to intercede with India in the name of humanity, peace, and justice to recede from its intransigence and to begin negotiations over Kashmir with no pre-conditions.  The lives, human rights, and aspirations of millions are at stake, far more so than what propelled the international community to action in Southern Sudan.

Sardar Liaqat Kayani mentioned that the negotiations should include the indigenous Kashmiri leadership, not just Pakistan and Indian voices which have failed for 65 years to effectuate a solution.  The cease fire line should not be made an international boundary, either de fact or de jure.

Mr. Zahid Hamidi explained that India is the key to resolving the Kashmir dispute.  The Government of India needs persuasion that its national and economic security will be strengthened, not weakened, by self-determination in Kashmir.

Sardar Zarif Khan, the M. C. of the event said that all Kashmiris are asking, is moral suasion against India’s illegal and brutal occupation exerted by the United States and the United Nations, not the armed troops that were employed in Kuwait, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Following organizations endorsed the event.

  1. Pakistan Link
  2. Pakistan Muslim League (N)
  3. Pakistan Muslim League (Q)
  4. Peoples Party of Pakistan
  5. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
  6. Muttahida Qaumi Movement
  7. Azad Jammu Kashmir Muslim conference
  8. Peoples Party Azad Kashmir
  9. Peoples Party Pakistan, Azad Kashmir
  10. Muslim League Azad Kashmir
  11. Jamaat-e-Islami, Azad Kashmir.

 

Similar Posts

  • Fresh thinking is needed to cut the Gordian knot in Kashmir

    “The best way to solve any problem is to remove its cause.” Dr. Martin Luther King

    The Joint Resistance Leadership (JRL) in Kashmir has shown willingness to talk provided the Government of India clarifies the parameters of talks.

    In an interview with The Indian Express, (June 5, 2018) Dineshwar Sharma, the Chief Interlocutor said, “When I talk to the younger generation there (Kashmir), often they confront me with so many questions and even talk about Azaadi… Any rational discussion will be possible when we are able to first address the sentiment of the people…” In this interview, Mr. Sharma has made it clear that the sentiments of the people of Kashmir are for Azaadi.

  • |

    Fai outlined eight areas for establishing communal harmony in Kashmir

    Monterey, California. March 31, 2014. Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of the ‘World Kashmir Awareness’ highlighted eight areas to create an atmosphere for communal harmony that will ultimately lead the people of Jammu & Kashmir to a meaningful and purposeful dialogue. He was speaking at a Kashmir event near Naval Lodge Monterey, organized by the American Muslim Alliance which is headed by Dr. Agha Saeed, an eminent political scientist

  • |

    Dr. Fai Addressed a Forum of Journalists in Washington

    WASHINGTON, D.C. June 27, 2012 (APP): Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognized disputed territory and has never been an integral part of India, a veteran Kashmiri leader said.

    “I want to debunk this myth created by India that Kashmir is an integral part of India —- this is a matter of historical record that India occupied the region on October 27, 1947 when the very first Indian soldier set foot on the soil of Kashmir —- the highest diplomatic forums including the United Nations and the United States have recognized the disputed nature of the region,” Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai told a forum of journalists in Springfield, Virginia.

    The Kashmiri-American activist said in the post-9/11 world, New Delhi has tried to weave a smokescreen with some unfounded myths, which seek to discredit the genuine struggle of the people. But these ploys will never be able to cover up the reality and sufferings of people in the Occupied Kashmir, he added.

  • |

    Kashmir: Where the Truth Doesn’t Matter

    NPR’s Julie McCarthy was in Kashmir earlier in September and reported on how different the unrest seems now compared to previous years. “First of all, there’s this unprecedented kind of force being used. There’s these high-velocity pellet shotguns for crowd control. And it’s left thousands of people riddled with pellet injuries. And a lot of them have damaged eyesight. And some demonstrators have thrown stones, attacked police stations and government buildings. And, unusually, this started in rural areas. And it has spread throughout the Kashmir Valley. And it’s lasted over 60 days. That’s also unusual.”

    Perhaps it’s not enough to point out that the champion of this latest uprising, a person who was slain in a fashion frequently called “extrajudicial” by others in the press, and whose killing was the primary provocation for the current uprising, was a self-declared militant who had used social media to resist the Indian occupation. He was someone who had become a symbol of the true spirit of resistance in the hearts of all Kashmiris.

  • |

    Kashmir Awareness Campaign

    The purpose of this paper is to provide you with a plan to mount an educational and  awareness campaign in support of self-determination in Jammu & Kashmir and to enlist the support of foreign embassies in your country, NGO’s (both international and national) and media (both international and national)  to persuade India and Pakistan to include Kashmiri leadership in any future dialogue that will lead to the settlement of the Kashmir dispute.

  • Kashmiri aspirations must be respected

    “If parties (India & Pakistan) come here and both of them call upon the Security Council to make recommendations for the solution of their (Kashmir) dispute, ought they not in advance agree to abide by it? They are not bound to ask the Security Council to make such recommendations, but if they do, I ask the Committee of Experts if they have not thereby implied that they will conform or try to conform to them.” Ambassador Warren Austin of the United States at the Security Council on May 26, 1948.

    If promises are made to be broken, then Kashmir may be summoned to prove the treacherous proposition. Broken promises haunt Kashmir’s history, and explain its tragedy.

    The Kashmir issue is simply this: the people of a large territory which is not part of any existing sovereign state were assured by the entire international community represented by the United Nations that they would be enabled to decide their future by a free vote. Until now, this assurance has not been honored.

    With the lapse of British paramountcy on August 15, 1947, broken promises over Kashmir came not like single spies but in battalions, to borrow from Hamlet. Princely states enjoyed three options: accession to India, accession to Pakistan, or independence. But the choice, according to India’s Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and tacitly endorsed by the British,