|

Kashmiri American community vowed to continue the struggle for self-determination

 

bombay1

Washington, D.C. June 5, 2012. The Kashmiri-American community in the Washington metropolitan area has vowed to continue their struggle for right to self-determination. At an impressive gathering at Bombay Tandoor, Tysons Corner, members of the community including academics, political activists and friends of Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai, pledged to carry forward his work during the period of his incarceration.

Speaking on the occasion, Dr Fai said there is no restriction on him to continue his work for a universally acknowledged cause. He clarified to his well-wishers that the prosecution had withdrawn charges initially leveled against him to be the agent of a foreign government.

Judge Liam O’Grady, while announcing the verdict for two-year imprisonment earlier this year, had made it clear that “it’s (sentencing) necessary, even though you have done some very moving things on behalf of the Kashmir people and that your cause is a wonderful cause,” Fai told the gathering.

Dr. Fai urged the community members to continue to support the cause of Kashmir. He quoted again Judge O’Grady who said, “I sincerely hope that while you’re at a minimal security facility like Cumberland, that I see no reason why you can’t continue to advocate on behalf of the Kashmiri people and to write. I know that the KAC is dormant, I guess is the word for it at this stage, but there may be an opportunity to arrange conferences through other people in the future, and I hope that cause continues to be identified as an important international matter. And good luck to you.”

“No solution to the 65‑year‑old Kashmir conflict that does not command a consensus among the 17 million Kashmiri people can endure, Dr. Fai stressed, just as no solution to East Timor held a chance of success until the East Timorese leadership was consulted and a referendum on independence from Indonesia was held.”

For too long, Fai underscored, India’s persecution of people of Kashmir has been buried by the fetching slogan, “The world’s largest democracy.” There is no democracy in Kashmir; only military rule and the law of the gun. In fact the presence of more than 700,000 Indian military and paramilitary forces have made Kashmir the largest army concentration anywhere in the world.

Mr. Hamid Malik, President, Pakistan Link while welcoming the participants said. “The Kashmiri American community is honored to have the people like Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai who has dedicated his life for the cause of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. We remain indebted to him for his friendship and leadership during the past two decades.

Dr. Imtiaz Khan noted that more than 100,000 Kashmiris have been killed by Indian military and paramilitary personnel over the last two decades, and deplored the silence of the international community because of India’s nuclear and economic strength. 

Dr. Khan maintained that United Nations Security Council resolutions shouldered the United Nations with a moral obligation to intervene on behalf of the people of Kashmir; and, that the United Nations should thicken its monitoring force along the cease‑fire line.

Dr. Zulfiqar Kazmi said that Kashmiris crave only what every American covets: human rights, democratic values, peace and justice, and believe that the United States successes in East Timor and Southern Sudan could be duplicated in Kashmir with persistence, moral suasion, and statesmanship.

Dr. Kazmi maintained that bilateral India‑Pakistan talks could never resolve the Kashmir conflict. That formula has proven utterly bankrupt for more than 65 years, and nothing has changed but the faces.

Sardar Zahoor  Khan asked, is trade and commerce trampling on principles, democratic values, and human rights in Kashmir?  He said that the sacrifices given by the people of Kashmir must no go in vain.

Sardar Zalfiqar Khan said that the way to resolve the Kashmir dispute is through peaceful tripartite negotiations. Even this will not succeed unless there is the direct involvement of a third party, like the United States or the United Nations.

bombay13Mr. Mazhar Chugtai said that the US must assume the position as a leader and take an active role in finding a lasting settlement on Kashmir. It is obvious that no settlement can last if it is not based on justice for the people of Kashmir and recognition of their inherent rights.

Mr. Zubair Khan said that the Governments of India and Pakistan should include the Kashmiri leadership ‑ the All Parties Hurriyet Conference that represents the broader spectrum of the opinion of the people of Kashmir –with the peace process.

Mr. Zahid Hussain said that Kashmir needs international attention.  It is the most dangerous nuclear hotspot on the earth. Third party mediation is imperative after more than half a century of bankrupt bilateral bickering between India and Pakistan.

Mr. Sheikh Siddik suggested that Kashmiris themselves must be made an equal negotiating partner in the peace enterprise.  Their studied exclusion from  any role in deciding their own fate in the past has proved disastrous both for themselves and South Asia generally.

Mr. Junaid Bashir emphasized that human rights are cheapened, when enforcement is selective. He ended optimistically by declaring that he was certain that a self-determination solution to Kashmir can be fashioned that honors the aspirations and wishes of the people of Jammu & Kashmir.

Dr. Maqsood Chaudhary appealed to the international community to intercede with India in the name of humanity, peace, and justice to recede from its intransigence and to begin negotiations over Kashmir with no pre-conditions.  The lives, human rights, and aspirations of millions are at stake, far more so than what propelled the international community to action in Southern Sudan.

Sardar Liaqat Kayani mentioned that the negotiations should include the indigenous Kashmiri leadership, not just Pakistan and Indian voices which have failed for 65 years to effectuate a solution.  The cease fire line should not be made an international boundary, either de fact or de jure.

Mr. Zahid Hamidi explained that India is the key to resolving the Kashmir dispute.  The Government of India needs persuasion that its national and economic security will be strengthened, not weakened, by self-determination in Kashmir.

Sardar Zarif Khan, the M. C. of the event said that all Kashmiris are asking, is moral suasion against India’s illegal and brutal occupation exerted by the United States and the United Nations, not the armed troops that were employed in Kuwait, Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Following organizations endorsed the event.

  1. Pakistan Link
  2. Pakistan Muslim League (N)
  3. Pakistan Muslim League (Q)
  4. Peoples Party of Pakistan
  5. Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf
  6. Muttahida Qaumi Movement
  7. Azad Jammu Kashmir Muslim conference
  8. Peoples Party Azad Kashmir
  9. Peoples Party Pakistan, Azad Kashmir
  10. Muslim League Azad Kashmir
  11. Jamaat-e-Islami, Azad Kashmir.

 

Similar Posts

  • |

    Kashmir’s Jalil Andrabi and China’s Chen Guangcheng: A Similar Path, but a Fork in the Road

    One of the darkest chapters of Indian judicial partiality was left hanging half closed and banging in the wind when Major Avtar Singh, the killer of internationally known human rights activist and Chairman of Kashmir Commission of Jurists, Advocate Jalil Andrabi, was found dead after he killed his wife and two children, and finally himself this past Saturday morning, June 9, 2012, in Selma, California. Avtar Singh, a fugitive from justice, who lived in the hot dry central California community, a suburb of Fresno, was clearly haunted by his past, a past that had seen the blood spilled of more than one man by his own hands. He had killed four others to hide the murder of Andrabi, and now he had killed his own family.  

    In killing Jalil Andrabi, Avtar Singh certainly did not act on his own volition. He was only a major.   His act was no doubt a response to orders from above and occurred in a longstanding climate of impunity that the Indian army enjoys in Kashmir.   The Armed Forces Special Powers Act, which gives any Indian soldier the right in Kashmir to take a Kashmiri’s life under any circumstance, has enabled such a climate for decades.  And Jalil Andrabi had become a hated, despised man by the Army, a man dangerous to the status quo of continued murder and torture that had been taking place in Kashmir’s jails, interrogation centers and detention facilities for many years.  

  • |

    Kashmir Needs Political And Not Military Solution: Dr. Fai

    Baltimore, Maryland. April 17, 2017. Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of ‘World Kashmir Awareness Forum’ voiced his continuing belief that the conflict over Kashmir cannot be resolved through military means. Kashmir is a political issue and has to be resolved through political means by involving all parties to the conflict – the Governments of India & Pakistan and the legitimate leadership of the Kashmiri resistance. He was speaking on the subject of Kashmir at the 42nd Annual Convention of ‘Islamic Circle of North America’ at Baltimore Convention Center. More than 20,000 people participated in this year’s convention. Other panelists included: Mr. Adem Carroll, Dr. M. A. Dhar, Dr. Nakibur Rahman and Bro. Tariq Rehman.

  • |

    State of human rights in Kashmir : Testimony

    March 17, 2014

    Sir Nigel Rodley
    Chairperson
    UN Human Rights Committee
    Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
    Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
    E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:

    I am grateful for the opportunity to submit this testimony on the state of human rights in Kashmir to the 110th session of the United Nations Human Rights Committee being held in Geneva, Switzerland, this week until March 28, 2014. Much to my chagrin in light of the warming of diplomacy between India and Pakistan and incipient dialogue between India and Kashmiri leaders, the state of human rights in the disputed territory is chilling. Indeed, it shocks the conscience.

    Indiscriminate killings:

    The best estimate of extrajudicial killings in Kashmir since 1989 approaches a staggering 100,000. That number dwarfs the killings in Northern Ireland, Palestine, Bosnia, Kosovo and Southern Sudan which have brought the world to tears and revulsion. The 100,000 corpses also tops the death toll for United States forces in Vietnam over 10 years.

    Arundhati Roy, an Indian novelist, essayist, the Booker Prize and Sydney Peace Prize winner said that “Caught in the middle are the people of Kashmir. More than 100,000 people, mostly innocent civilians, have died in the 20-year conflict.”

  • |

    Is Kashmir an Issue of Election of Self-determination?

    This is an opportunity to explore a vexing but significant topic in the field of human rights: self-determination. The right of self-determination has been celebrated for ages. It is a basic principle of the United Nation Charter which has been reaffirmed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and applied countless times to the settlement of international disputes. The concept played a significant part in the post-world war I settlement, leading for example to plebiscite in a number of disputed border areas, even though no reference was made to self-determination in the League of Nations Covenant.

  • |

    Kashmir: Where the Truth Doesn’t Matter

    NPR’s Julie McCarthy was in Kashmir earlier in September and reported on how different the unrest seems now compared to previous years. “First of all, there’s this unprecedented kind of force being used. There’s these high-velocity pellet shotguns for crowd control. And it’s left thousands of people riddled with pellet injuries. And a lot of them have damaged eyesight. And some demonstrators have thrown stones, attacked police stations and government buildings. And, unusually, this started in rural areas. And it has spread throughout the Kashmir Valley. And it’s lasted over 60 days. That’s also unusual.”

    Perhaps it’s not enough to point out that the champion of this latest uprising, a person who was slain in a fashion frequently called “extrajudicial” by others in the press, and whose killing was the primary provocation for the current uprising, was a self-declared militant who had used social media to resist the Indian occupation. He was someone who had become a symbol of the true spirit of resistance in the hearts of all Kashmiris.