|

Fai outlined eight areas for establishing communal harmony in Kashmir

Articles, Uncategorised

Monterey, California. March 31, 2014. Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, Secretary General of the ‘World Kashmir Awareness’ highlighted eight areas to create an atmosphere for communal harmony that will ultimately lead the people of Jammu & Kashmir to a meaningful and purposeful dialogue. He was speaking at a Kashmir event near Naval Lodge Monterey, organized by the American Muslim Alliance which is headed by Dr. Agha Saeed, an eminent political scientist

and a  brilliant strategist. The M.C. of the event was Mr. Agha Bilal Saeed, a well-known and prominent community activist. Mr. Mark Hinkle, former Chairman, the Libertarian National Committee also spoke at the occasion.

 

Dr. Fai elaborated the eight points as:

 

i.          The rights of all members of minorities in Jammu and Kashmir should be protected at all costs;

 

ii.         All those persons who have been displaced from Jammu and Kashmir since 1947 should be encouraged to return;

 

iii.        The members of the Pandit community displaced in the recent past should be facilitated to return and their rehabilitation guaranteed;

 

iv.        The ‘Armed Forces Special Powers Act’ (AFSPA) should be repealed as recommended by the leadership of civil society of India, like Justice Rajiner Sachar & Ambassador Kuldip Nayar;

 

v.         The bunkers from villages and towns need to be dismantled;

 

vi.        The release of political prisoners would go a long way to hasten the progress of peace and reconciliation in the region;

 

vii.       The Kashmiris should be integral component of the ongoing peace process as they are the primary stake holders. They should be inclusive in the peace process with India & Pakistan as it will facilitate permanent, durable and honorable settlement of the Kashmir dispute;

 

viii.      The leadership of both India Pakistan must recognize that there can be no settlement, negotiated or otherwise, without the active and full participation of the people of Jammu and Kashmir living on both sides of the Cease-fire Line, including the Kashmiri diaspora

 

Dr. Fai emphasized that the resistance in Kashmir is not communal and should not be. The compulsions of Kashmir’s history and the demands of its future alike forbid religious conflict or sectarian strife. It is important to note that the people of Kashmir should not read their history wrong.  It is a history of tolerance and amity between different religious communities.  Kashmiri culture has a long tradition of moderation and non-violence.  This culture does not generate extremism or fundamentalism. The people of Kashmir know that the conflict was never a fight between Hindus and Muslims.  Nor was it a border dispute between India and Pakistan.  It has always been about the destiny, future and lives of 18 million people of Jammu & Kashmir, be they Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists.  Can anyone deny the fact – of no small significance – that while the Subcontinent under British rule was the scene of recurrent murderous strife, communal riots were unheard of in Kashmir? That unquestionable fact brings out the real character of Kashmir’s heritage, Fai informed the audience.

 

When all is said and done, one simple fact stands out. The Kashmiri Muslims as such do have sentiments of regard and esteem for the Kashmiri Pandits which they cannot elicit from anyone else. Should this alone not be a basic consideration in our thinking about the future, Fai asked?


Fai stressed that the right of self-determination that was guaranteed by the United Nations has to be exercised by all the people of Jammu & Kashmir, irrespective of their religious background and linguistic limitations. The right of self-determination, by definition, is an unrestricted right. The resolutions of the UN Security Council do imply recognition of the inherent right of the people of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to decide their future independently of the contending claims of India and Pakistan. The idea of independence of Kashmir, if not for all zones, has in fact never been beyond the mental horizons of its people. No solution of the Kashmir problem will be just or viable if it ignores that intense, popular sentiment. Justice and pragmatism require that no one of the conceivable options for the people should be excluded.


It must be pointed out that an independent Kashmir would not be a Kashmir isolated from India and Pakistan. On the contrary, it would have close links with both neighbors. Indeed, it would make a contribution to the stabilization of peace in South Asia which no other entity can, Fai insisted.

 

Dr. Fai hoped that the United States and the world powers will realize that what is at stake in the dispute is not only the survival of the people of Kashmir and not only the peace in the region of South Asia but the peace in the rest of the world.

 

Mr. Mark Hinkle, speaking on the subject said Americans on the whole are ignorant about the situation in Kashmir. He told the audience that the policy makers including our Congressmen need to be educated and urged to take a principle stand on Kashmir. The right of self-determination which was promised by the United Nations need to be exercised by the people of Kashmir in a free and fair atmosphere.

 

Mr. Hinkle added that the world has changed after September 11th 2001 but that does not mean that the people with genuine and just cause should be ignored. He said that it is an Americans tradition that when people demand human rights and human dignity, Americans feel morally obliged to help. The non-violent and peaceful struggle of the people of Kashmir demand an urgent attention by the world community. Mr. Hinkle concluded by saying that we need more people like Dr. Agha Saeed and Dr. Fai to take an interest in the world around us to ensure a better tomorrow.

Similar Posts

  • |

    How I became Involved in the Cause of Kashmir at the international level

    I want to tell you a little story that touched my life in a very personal way in 1979. It is important to consider, I assure you, because of its historic significance, not only in having an impact in a very real way upon my own survival and the personal vision I came to adopt for the rest of my life, but how it came to shape the very destiny of Kashmir itself. My own life became inextricably linked just as intimately as a man and woman united in marriage. Each detail of this story is integral to understanding who I was then, who I am now, and the process that formed my calling and the rest of my life.
     
    I was in my late 20s then with a driving zeal, as is in every young man’s heart in Kashmir, to make a significant impact somewhere and somehow on life’s stage. At this particular time, I had been placed in charge of the international section of a major conference being held in the Capitol of Kashmir, Srinagar. I was inspired to invite a speaker of an international stature whose presence could be used to energize and internationalize the issue of Kashmir on the right of self-determination.
  • |

    Candle Light Vigil

    Candle Light Vigil
     

    During Prime Minister Modi’s Meeting with President Obama

     
    To demand what was pledged to the people of Jammu & Kashmir by both India and Pakistan and guaranteed by the Security Council, with the unequivocal endorsement of the United States, namely demilitarization of Kashmir and a free vote organized impartially to ascertain popular will.
  • |

    Kashmir Event Held in Washington, D.C.

    Washington, D.C. February 15, 2104. “Our efforts should be to persuade the world community including the United States to urge both India and Pakistan to include the leadership of the people of Jammu & Kashmir in the negotiations to peacefully resolve the dispute over Kashmir. When we talk of Kashmir, we talk of the sentiments and enormous sacrifices made by the Kashmiri people during the past 67 years for a cause dear to all inhabitants, be they Muslims, Hindus, or Buddhists. It is time that both India and Pakistan realize that until the Kashmiri leadership is included in the peace process, these negotiations between India and Pakistan may not lead them to any logical conclusion,” said Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai at a seminar, held at Holiday Inn Hotel and organized by Kashmir Form, Washington, D.C.

  • |

    US court order: Kashmiri across divide welcome Dr Fai’s release

    The Kashmiri leaders on both sides of the Line of Control (LoC) welcomed the US court order for the release of Kashmiri lobbyist and Executive Director of the US-based Kashmir American Council (KAC) Dr Ghulam Nabi Fai.

    “This is the victory of justice and every Kashmiri hails the decision of American court,” said Prime Minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Chaudhry Abdul Majeed while talking to The Express Tribune.

    Dr Fai is the ambassador of Kashmiris right to self-determination who has sacrificed a lot for the promotion of Kashmir cause, he said.

    The Federal Court Eastern Virginia in its release orders issued Friday said Dr Fai exhibited good morals during his imprisonment and he has been working for the cause of Kashmiri nation.

  • |

    The UN and Kashmir: Where Do We Go From Here?

    If we were to judge the UN based upon its history of involvement in efforts to resolve international conflicts, the simplest answer is that it has been an enormous failure. The UN of course is a far more complex organization whose work covers such a wide range of activities that conflict resolution is really only a small aspect of its work. Nevertheless, if we consider the fact that its fundamental mission in being created was to be a means of preventing global catastrophes like the Second World War, then conflict resolution would have to be considered Job One. In addition, the word “conflict” in the phrase “conflict resolution” was defined as conflict among or between sovereign nations. As Chapter I, Article 2, stipulates, ” Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter;”