|

Kashmiris’ Wishes Must Be Respected: Dr. Fai

Washington, D.C. June 29, 2012. “Any Kashmir solution that fails to command the consensus of the 17 million people of Jammu & Kashmir is doomed to shipwreck moments after launching. Indeed, any process that ignores the wishes of the people of Kashmir will not only prove to be an exercise in futility but can also cause incalculable human and political damage. Thus, it makes no sense to negotiate over their heads. The best that could result from these meaningless negotiations would be sound and fury signifying nothing, as at Tashkent, Simla, Lahore and elsewhere,” said Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai at a reception held in his honor in Darnestown, Maryland.

Dr. Fai thanked the members of the Kashmiri American community for becoming instrumental in highlighting the issue of Kashmir not only in Washington, D. C. but in New York City as well. He told his well-wishers that the people of the Indian Occupied Kashmir remain indebted to them for their relentless and consistent advocacy for the just cause of Kasshmir.

“India’s policy towards Kashmir has been uniformly trickery and deceitful. It initially championed, fashioned, and expressly accepted United Nations Security Council resolutions mandating a self‑determination plebiscite in Kashmir administered by the United Nations. India soon dishonored its obligation when it perceived Kashmiris would never vote accession to Indian sovereignty in a free and fair election. It unilaterally proclaimed Kashmir had fallen into its territorial universe irrespective of international law and the contrary insistence of the United Nations,” Fai added.

 

Dr. Fai demonstrated Kashmir’s international law and moral right to self-determination every bit if not more compelling than the self-determination honored in East Timor in 1999 and in Southern Sudan in 2011. In a free and fair plebiscite, the overwhelming percentage of the 17 million people of Kashmir would vote for ‘Aazadi’ – freedom from occupation. Further, a Kashmiri nation would be a model of democracy and religious pluralism. Kashmiris of all faiths have historically enjoyed amicable and harmonious relations.

Fai explained that in Kashmir, during its centuries of virtual independence, communal violence or abrasiveness was unknown between Muslims, Pundits, Buddhists, and Sikhs. Kashmiris, he added, shared values and a heritage that far transcended religious divide. Historically, Dr. Fai noted, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Muslims in Kashmir lived in amity and warmth. Sectarian squabbles have been rare. But this serenity was destroyed by the onset of India’s illegal military occupation of Kashmir on October 27, 1947.

Fai said that the people of Kashmir share a vision of peace and stability between India and Pakistan, and of progress and prosperity for their people .The people of Kashmir always want the people of India and Pakistan to live in peace and prosperity. That is why they believe that Kashmir conflict has to be resolved through peaceful tripartite negotiations and not through military means.

He emphasized that durable peace and development of harmonious relations and friendly cooperation will serve the vital interests of the peoples of India & Pakistan, enabling them to devote their energies for a better future. It is also true that recognizing that the nuclear dimension of the security environment of the two countries adds to their responsibility for avoidance of conflict between them.

Dr. Fai reminded President Obama to listen to an Indian scholar, Pankaj Mishra who wrote in ‘The New York Review of Books’ on December 8, 2008 that “The road to stability in Pakistan and Afghanistan runs through the Valley of Kashmir,”; to a Pakistani scholar, Ahmed Rashid who wrote in ‘Foreign Policy’ on November 11, 2010 that “The road to Kabul runs through Kashmir,” and to Admiral Mike Mullen, who spoke at ‘Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’ on September 10, 2011 that “Solving the complicated issue of Kashmir would also unlock many issues between India and Pakistan.”

Fai also pleaded with President Obama to persuade the Indian Prime Minister to cease repression of Kashmiris; release political prisoners; allow access to international human rights organizations; restore full political and human rights, such as political dissent, assembly, and association, and the freedom to travel abroad; repeal all draconian laws; and start a dialogue with the genuine leadership of the people of Kashmir and Pakistan. Talks between India, Pakistan and Kashmiris should start without preconditions, and without further delay.

Dr. Fai stressed that India should and ultimately will come to believe that its security and economic interests will be strengthened, not weakened, by acceding to a self-determination plebiscite in Kashmir as mandated by the United Nations Security Council resolutions.

Those who spoke at the reception included: Mr. Liaqat Kayani (Host), Sardar Zarif Khan, Dr. Mossadiq Qadri, Sardar Zulfiqar Khan, Mr. Karamat Hussain, Mr. Zubair Khan, Mr. Hamid Malik, Sardar Asghar Khan.

Similar Posts

  • |

    State of human rights in Kashmir : Testimony

    March 17, 2014

    Sir Nigel Rodley
    Chairperson
    UN Human Rights Committee
    Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights
    United Nations Office at Geneva
    CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland
    Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
    E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee:

    I am grateful for the opportunity to submit this testimony on the state of human rights in Kashmir to the 110th session of the United Nations Human Rights Committee being held in Geneva, Switzerland, this week until March 28, 2014. Much to my chagrin in light of the warming of diplomacy between India and Pakistan and incipient dialogue between India and Kashmiri leaders, the state of human rights in the disputed territory is chilling. Indeed, it shocks the conscience.

    Indiscriminate killings:

    The best estimate of extrajudicial killings in Kashmir since 1989 approaches a staggering 100,000. That number dwarfs the killings in Northern Ireland, Palestine, Bosnia, Kosovo and Southern Sudan which have brought the world to tears and revulsion. The 100,000 corpses also tops the death toll for United States forces in Vietnam over 10 years.

    Arundhati Roy, an Indian novelist, essayist, the Booker Prize and Sydney Peace Prize winner said that “Caught in the middle are the people of Kashmir. More than 100,000 people, mostly innocent civilians, have died in the 20-year conflict.”

  • |

    Kashmir: Urgency in dialogue process

    “All of us remain concerned that the issue of Jammu and Kashmir should be solved through peaceful negotiations and should be willing to lend all the strength we have to the resolution of this matter.” President Nelson Mandela at the NAM Summit – September 2, 1998

    In matters of international conflict resolution, that can only imply the involvement of a third party mediator or facilitator. If Ashok and Ahmad can’t put Humpty Dumpty back together because they can’t agree on where the pieces go, then Sam, a specialist in eggshell reconstruction, should be called upon in order for differences to be resolved. Most importantly, without a third party’s impartial diligence in pursuing a settlement, breakdowns in lines of communication or other disputes that may arise will inevitably create barriers to resolution, and the process will fail. The side in the dispute which offers initiatives will always be seen as weak when both are out rattling their sabres; hence no progress can be made.

  • |

    Thank you

    November 29, 2013

     
    Dear all,
     
    I am thankful to Allah (s.w.t.) for an early release from the Federal Prison Camp in Cumberland, Maryland. Upon receiving the order from Judge O’Grady, the prison authorities gave me just 10 minutes to pack my belongings and to leave from the premises of the Federal Prison Camp. I am pleased to be home with my family and friends since Friday, November 22, 2013.
     
    At the beginning, the notion of imprisonment weighed very heavily on my conscience. I was mindful that some of my friends wanted to know the conditions I was living in. The conditions at the Camp in Cumberland were propitious and the avenues available were favorable to all the inmates.
  • |

    Peace still possible in the region of subcontinent: Dr. Fai

    Washington, D.C. February 6, 20114. “The United Nations Security Council resolutions on Kashmir were not resolutions in the routine sense of the term. Their provisions were negotiated in detail by the United Nations Commission with India and Pakistan and it was only after the consent of both Governments was explicitly obtained that they were endorsed by the Security Council. They thus constitute a binding and solemn international agreement about the settlement of the Kashmir dispute,” said Dr. Ghulam Nabi Fai in a paper read during a seminar organized by Mohtaram Shabir Ahmed Shah Sahib in Srinagar entitled: Kashmir Dispute and the Role of the United Nations.

  • |

    Preventive Diplomacy: Successes & Failures

    “It is also true that there is no peace and sustainable development without respect for human rights.” Antonio Guterres, Secretary General- elect of the United Nations

    Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind.” President John F. Kennedy

    It has always been a challenge to exchange views on conflict prevention and the summoning into being a peaceful and prosperous world. The intellectual debate is great, but the stakes are even greater. Men and women have yearned for peace and prosperity for ages. President Abraham Lincoln in his second inaugural address declared, “Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away.” Winston Churchill brilliantly recognized that it is invariably better to jaw-jaw than to war-war.

  • |

    Universality of Human Rights: Myth or Reality

    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Article 5, Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    The statement of Mr. Ban Ki-moon – UN Secretary General deserves an appreciation who wants to console people by saying: “On Human Rights Day, let us recommit to guaranteeing the fundamental freedoms and protecting the human rights of all.”

    The 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on its 68th anniversary needs to be applauded.  Everyone knows that fundamental human rights are universal. That is the tacit assumption of the Declaration.